Myalgic encephalomyelitis – a persistent enteroviral infection? by Dr. Elizabeth Dowsett (Microbiologist), Dr. Melvin Ramsay (Infectious Disease Physician), Dr. Robert McCartney (Senior Chief Medical Laboratory Scientific Officer at the Regional Virus Laboratory, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow) and Dr. Eleanor Bell (Virologist) (In revision and in reply to by Larrin Carney)
Postgrad Med J (1990) 66, 526 - 530 © The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1990
E.G. Dowsett¹, A.M. Ramsay²†, R.A. McCartney³ and E.J. Bell³*
¹ Basildon and Thurrock Health Authority, Basildon Hospital, Essex
² Royal Free Hospital, London
³ Enterovirus Reference Laboratory, Regional Virus Laboratory, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow, UK
(In revision & in reply to, 1st September 2025 by Larrin Carney)
Summary:
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis is a common disability but frequently misinterpreted. Amongst 6,000 patients referred for general microbiological diagnosis between 1975 and 1987, 420 cases were recognised. Coxsackie B neutralization tests, in 205 of these, demonstrated significant titres in 103/205 (50%), while 123 additionally investigated for enteroviral IgM, 46/123 (37%) were positive. This illness is distinguished from a variety of other post-viral states by an unique clinical and epidemiological pattern characteristic of enteroviral infection. Prompt recognition and advice to avoid over-exertion is mandatory. Routine diagnosis, specific therapy and prevention, await further technical advances.
Introduction
Since 1934, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.) has been increasingly reported from socially developed countries and temperate regions of the world. Endemic prevalence alternates with periodic epidemics, showing a curious predilection for female staff of health care and teaching institutions. Maximum incidence in both sexes occurs in the third decade. M.E. is a multisystem syndrome including nervous, cardiovascular, endocrine and other involvement, distinguished by severe muscle fatigue following trivial exertion. Other characteristics include high morbidity, low mortality, a prolonged relapsing course and variation in intensity of symptoms within and between episodes, tending to chronicity.²³ Conventional technology is limited in demonstrating abnormalities and this has hitherto permitted misinterpretation of the symptoms as psychogenic.⁴⁵ Historically, a marked similarity to Non-Paralytic Poliomyelitis in respect of prodrome, seasonal and geographical incidence¹–³ caused diagnostic confusion. A cluster of patients with M.E. (some of whom showed positive tests for M.E.), prompted collaboration between the authors.
Correspondence: E.G. Dowsett, M.B., Ch.B., Dip. Bact., 7 West Park Crescent, Billericay, Essex CM12 9ED, UK.
Accepted: 22 November 1989
†Dr. A.M. Ramsay died on 29 March 1990.
Patient selection
We adopted the following clinical criteria for investigation of M.E.: a syndrome commonly initiated by respiratory and/or gastrointestinal infection but an insidious or more dramatic onset following neurological, cardiac or endocrine disability occurs.
The pathognomonic features are:
01. a complaint of general or local muscular fatigue following minimal exertion with prolonged recovery time;
02. neurological disturbance, especially of cognitive, autonomic and sensory functions;
03. variable involvement of cardiac and other systems;
04. a prolonged relapsing course.
Four hundred and twenty patients, fulfilling these criteria, were selected for further investigation amongst 6,000 patients with heterogeneous infections referred to one of us (EGD) between 1975 and 1987. Patients with M.E. comprised approximately 7% per annum of all who attended; 324/420 (77%) were referred from general practice and 96/420 (23%) from other hospital specialties in Essex and South London, including cardiology, endocrinology, neurology and psychiatry.
Clinical investigation
To elicit the essential features of this multisystem syndrome and ensure a comparable history, examination, and investigation for selected patients, a detailed questionnaire was devised with a scoring system weighted for the above diagnostic criteria. When tested on normal adults and clinic patients with other chronic diseases, none achieved scores in the M.E. range. Cognitive disturbances in patients with M.E. were readily elicited by failure to complete the questionnaire without assistance. Muscular fatigue was demonstrated by repeated activity such as weight raising on a block or climbing several flights of stairs, and myalgic foci by careful palpation of affected muscles with the finger tip. Standard methods were used to elicit other clinical signs.
Laboratory investigation
Tests included: routine haematological and biochemical screening; Paul Bunnell, Monospot or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) IgM, rheumatoid factor, liver and cardiac enzymes, thyroid function, blood glucose; bacterial and viral culture; serological tests for streptococcal infection, brucellosis, toxoplasmosis, legionella, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, rubella, respiratory syncytial virus and parvovirus. Specialist technology was introduced as it became available but did not include EBV reactivation.
Coxsackie B virus (CBV) serology
Neutralizing tests (NT) to CBV 1–5 were estimated using the Microtitre method described elsewhere.⁶
Titres of 512 and above were regarded as indicative and of 256 as suggestive, of recent CBV infection. After 1985, only sera positive by the μ antibody capture ELISA technique were tested by NT.
Immunology
Tests for immune complexes were performed as described elsewhere⁸ and autoimmune screening by standard immunofluorescence methods.
Results
Epidemiological characteristics
Age, sex, occupation of 420 patients with M.E., 307 (73%) were female and 113 (27%) male. The average age at onset was 32.3 years (range 7–64 years) – Table I; 172 (41%) were employed in health care or teaching, 109 (26%) in clerical, administrative or other professional posts, 88 (21%) in skilled or unskilled manual occupations and 51 (12%) not gainfully employed, including children, pensioners, housewives. Corresponding figures for other clinic attenders are 4%, 21%, 12% and 63% respectively.
Season and type of prodromal illness
A distinct prodrome occurred in 340/420 (81%) patients, characterized by a respiratory/gastrointestinal or ‘flu-like illness in 277/340 (81%) and lymphadenopathy and summer/autumn onset in 218/340 (64%). Alternative prodromal presentations in 63/340 (19%) included: acute neurological, visual or psychotic episodes, myo/pericarditis, pleurodynia, exanthems, enanthems, thyroiditis, orchitis, and mesenteric adenitis. The remaining patients, 80/420 (19%) described an insidious onset, 105/340 (31%) reported a similar illness in family or occupational contacts not invariably followed by M.E.. In eleven families, an incubation period of 2–5 days for the prodrome was noted, but subsequent recognition of M.E. varied from a few days to 6 months.
Clinical characteristics
Duration and severity of illness at first attendance of 420 patients
The duration was less than 3 months in 38 patients (9%); 1–2 years in 139 (32%); 3–10 years in 198 (47%); 11–20 years in 33 (8%) and 21–60 years in 17 (4%). Illness was of a relapsing remitting type in 130 (31%), fluctuating in 84 (20%), a steady level of disability in 105 (25%) and no remission or worse in 101 (24%).
Symptoms and Signs (Table II)
Symptomatology in M.E. is characteristically varied between age groups and episodes. Our study includes a number of families followed up from the prodromal illness, when the nature and frequency of symptoms may differ greatly from those recorded in individuals who subsequently develop M.E..
Relapse of M.E.
Known precipitants included physical and mental stress in all 420 patients (100%), intercurrent infection in 176 (42%), climatic change or hot baths in 50 (12%), surgery, immunization, hormonal disturbance in 38 (9%), psychoactive, antiarthritic or steroid drugs in 21 (5%).
*Includes frustration, elation, depression
†characteristically affects limbs, shoulder girdle, spinal muscles
††memory, concentration, anomia, dyslexia
†††especially circulation and thermoregulation
*hyperacusis, deafness, tinnitus
**mainly loss of accommodation, photophobia, nystagmus
***usually due to impaired spatial discrimination
****nausea/disturbance of intestinal motility
§frequency incontinence, retention
†enlargement, recurrent after prodrome
§§surgical intervention for abdominal pain
Laboratory Results
Haematology and Biochemistry
Screening tests were normal with the following exceptions: 55/420 (13%) had leukocyte counts below normal range (3,500 × 10⁹/l) with occasional atypical lymphocytes and 22/420 (5%), abnormal liver function tests, of whom two had hepatitis A. Two further patients had undiagnosed persistent hyperbilirubinaemia.
CBV serology
The sera of 205 patients with diagnostic features of M.E. seen before 1985, were tested by NT: 68/205 (33%) had titres indicative of recent CBV infection, while 35/205 (17%) suggested recent CBV infection tested by the enteroviral IgM ELISA system. Applying the diagnostic criteria established by McCartney et al.⁷, 38/124 (31%) had evidence of recent/active enteroviral infection. Sixteen patients in our study, who were retested annually for three years, showed persistently raised CBV NTs and intermittently positive enteroviral IgM.
Other viral investigations
Intercurrent viral infections occurred in 12 patients with positive enteroviral serology (not serological cross reactions). EBV IgM was positive in three patients; hepatitis A, respiratory syncytial virus and parvovirus in two cases each; influenza B, varicella, rubella, one case each.
Immunology
128/276 (46%) of patients tested had evidence of circulating immune complexes, but only 15/420 (4%), antinuclear, thyroid or muscle antibodies.
Discussion
Differentiation of the M.E. Syndrome from other forms of post-viral debility
In our opinion, two major errors are responsible for the present confusion surrounding the case definition, aetiology and diagnosis of M.E..⁹ First, there has been a failure to distinguish the syndrome from post-viral debility following Epstein-Barr mononucleosis, influenza and other common infections. Compared with M.E., these lack the dramatic effect of exercise upon muscle function, the multisystem involvement, diurnal variability of symptoms and prolonged relapsing course. Laboratory abnormalities recorded after mononucleosis and other infections which, as our results show, may occasionally co-exist with M.E. and, by their immunosuppressive effect, precipitate relapse. Second, there has been a failure to recognize the unique epidemiological pattern of M.E., which, from earliest accounts, has lead to confusion with Non-Paralytic Poliomyelitis.
The epidemiological features of M.E. require explanation
Polio viruses (Types 1–3) are the best known examples of a group of 69 enteroviruses which, by faecal/oral spread, commonly lead to asymptomatic childhood infection. The epidemiology of poliomyelitis remained enigmatic until virus isolation from carriers demonstrated the link between paralytic cases. In 1948, the non-polio enteroviruses (NPEV) were shown to be causative agents of illness previously designated as ‘Non-Paralytic Poliomyelitis’. Reports of NPEV isolation from individual cases¹,²,¹¹ or serological evidence of NPEV infection⁵,¹²,¹³, occur in many published accounts of M.E.. Our study also supports association of the M.E. syndrome with NPEV. Thirty three per cent of 205 patients tested had CBV NTs indicative of infection – a figure comparable with that for enterovirus–associated myocarditis.¹⁴ Seasonal distortion was excluded by the observation that 37/75 (49%) of those attending in winter and spring had significant CBV NT compared with 66/130 (51%) of those attending in summer and autumn. Moreover, 19.7% of our patients tested had positive enteroviral IgM tests compared with 12% of normal blood donors tested simultaneously in South London by the same technique.¹⁵
The geographical epidemiology of enteroviral infection depends entirely upon the interaction of climate and hygiene. Virtually all children born in hyperendemic tropical areas lacking sanitation, acquire immunity in early life. Conversely, many adults in temperate zones with seasonal and hygienic limitation of enterovirus circulation, lack immunity. Post-pubertal infections tend to be severe and lead (as in poliomyelitis) to the paradox of overt adult infection and epidemics in affluent societies with cool climates. It is only in these geographical areas that epidemic M.E. has been described. Sixty four per cent of our patients with a prodrome reported summer/autumn onset, with in 34/420 (8%), travel to an endemic area at any season was an antecedent factor. The peak incidence of M.E. is in the third decade and Table I indicates that a minority of our patients developed M.E. before puberty or after 45 years (when a less hygienic childhood may have afforded some immunity). In this country, asymptomatic children, especially when dispersed, are the main dispersers of infection. Male infants are more susceptible than females and possibly acquire earlier immunity. These factors do much to explain the sex and school contacts and the curious predisposition of health care and teaching staff.
Multi-system clinical involvement in patients with M.E.
Most enteroviral infections are biphasic. A non-specific prodromal illness precedes, by an interval, infection of target organs. Host factors, such as age, physical and mental stress, climatic change, hormones, immunosuppression, anti-inflammatory drugs, surgery and immunization, contribute to this outcome.¹⁶ The onset of illness and relapse in our patients was significantly associated with similar events. Enteroviruses exhibit an extensive cell tropism. Symptoms are protean within the family and community, depending upon the age and susceptibility of the host as well as the strain and virulence of the virus. Enteroviral syndromes which range from trivial to severe, include: respiratory, gastrointestinal, muscular and neurological infections, exanthems, enanthems, conjunctivitis, arthritis, diseases of endocrine and lymphatic glands. All of these are encountered in the prodrome of M.E.. In autumn 1976, at the beginning of our survey, 488/814 (60%) of all viruses associated with neurological manifestations notified to the Public Health Laboratory Service, were identified as NPEVs. This could well explain the common neurological and encephalitic features of M.E.. The psychological disturbances in our patients differed from classical depression in all but three patients had a normal premorbid personality, volition was preserved, weight and appetite disturbance minimal and treatment with antidepressant drugs ineffectual in 123/420 (29%) of patients in whom it had been tried. Moreover, neurophysiological research using cognitive event-related potentials has shown prolonged latencies in M.E. – an abnormality not present in patients with depression.¹⁸
Exercise related morbidity in M.E.
Coxsackie viruses are characteristically myotropic and enteroviral genomic sequences have been detected in muscle biopsies from patients with M.E..¹⁹ Exercise related abnormalities of function have been demonstrated by nuclear magnetic resonance²⁰ and single fibre electromyography²¹ including a failure to coordinate oxidative metabolism with anaerobic glycolysis causing abnormally early intracellular acidosis, consistent with the early fatigue and the slow recovery from exercise in M.E..
Coxsackie viruses can initiate non-cytolytic persistent infection in human cells.²² Animal models have demonstrated persistent infection in skeletal muscle,²³ myocardium,²⁴,²⁵ and deleterious effect of forced exercise on persistently infected muscles.²⁵ These studies elucidate the exercise-related morbidity and the chronic relapsing nature of M.E..
Diagnostic pitfalls in enterovirology
Asymptomatic enteroviral carriage is common (it is the rationale for oral polio vaccine) and caution is required in the interpretation of conventional laboratory tests or case/control studies. Virus isolation (unless from a sequestered site) may lack significance and the difficulty is compounded by an early and abundant neutralizing response. Acid dissociation of the virus from neutralizing antibody has been used to permit direct culture and the production of a monoclonal antibody (5 D 8/1), directed against a viral protein component (VP1) exclusive to enteroviruses, has demonstrated persistent bowel infection leading to systemic disease with VP1 antigen, free or bound to antibody, in the circulation of patients with M.E..⁸ Of 40 patients in our study referred for VPI testing, 20 had positive results.
Conclusions
Clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological data support the suggestion that M.E. is a complication in non-immune individuals of widespread subclinical NPEV infection.
M.E. predominantly affects the most socially and economically active section of society. Misinterpretation of this common illness as psychogenic delays the early recognition mandatory for modification of lifestyle which may avoid progression to chronic disability. Other forms of therapy are disappointing.²⁶ Despite the use of prophylactic anti-enteroviral drugs in animal research,²⁷ the control of enteroviral infection in humans still depends upon immunization and measures to improve public hygiene.²⁸
Acknowledgements
We should like to thank Dr. Morgan Capner, Kings College Hospital, Professor J.E. Banatvala, St. Thomas's Hospital, and Dr. D.A. Gamble, Epsom Public Health Laboratory for assistance with some CBV tests. We are indebted to Dr. D. Bainbridge, The London Hospital and Professor J.F. Mowbray, St. Mary’s Hospital for all the immunological studies.
References
1. Acheson, E.D. The clinical syndrome variously called benign myalgic encephalomyelitis, Iceland Disease and epidemic neuromyasthenia. Am J Med 1959, 26: 569–595.
2. Behan, P.O. & Behan, W.H.M. Postviral fatigue syndrome. CRC Crit Rev Neurobiol 1988, 4: 157–178.
3. Ramsay, A.M. Post viral fatigue syndrome – the saga of the Royal Free Disease. London: Gower Medical Publishing, 1986 (M.E. Association, P.O. Box 8, Stanford le Hope, Essex SS17 8EX).
4. Medvedev, C.P. & Beard, A.W. Royal Free Disease epidemic of 1955 – a reconsideration. Br Med J 1970 1: 7–11.
5. Bell, E.J. & McCartney, R.A. Study of Coxsackie B viruses in infections 1972–1983. J Hyg Camb 1984, 93: 197–203.
6. McCartney R.A., Banatvala J.E., Bell E.J. Routine use of μ-antibody-capture ELISA for the serological diagnosis of coxsackie B virus infections. J Med Virol. 1986;19(3):205–212.
7. Yousef, G.E., Bell, E.J., Mann, G.F., Murugesan, V., Smith, D.G., McCartney, R.A. & Mowbray, J.F. Chronic enterovirus infection in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. Lancet 1988, i: 146–150.
8. David, A., Wessely, S. & Pelosi, A.J. Post viral fatigue syndrome – time for a new approach. Br Med J 1988, 1: 696–698.
9. Hotchin, N.A., Read, N., Smith, D.G. & Crawford, D.H. Active Epstein-Barr virus infection in post viral fatigue syndrome. J Infect 1989, 18: 143–150.
10. Lyle, W.H. An outbreak of disease believed to have been caused by an Echo 9 virus. Ann Intern Med 1959, 51: 248–269.
11. Keighley, B.D. & Bell, E.J. Sporadic myalgic encephalomyelitis in a rural practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1983, 33: 339–341.
12. Calder, B.D., Warnock, P.J., McCartney, R.A. & Bell, E.J. Coxsackie B viruses and the post viral syndrome – a prospective study in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987, 37: 11–14.
13. Bell, E.J., Irvine, K.G., Gardiner, A.J.S. & Rodger, J.C. Coxsackie B infection in a general medical unit. Scott Med J 1983, 28: 157–159.
14. Muir, P., Tilzey, A.J., English, T.A.H., Nicholson, F., Signy, M. & Banatvala, J.E. Chronic relapsing pericarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: serological evidence of persistent enterovirus infection. Lancet 1989, i: 804–807.
15. Loria, R.M. Host conditions affecting the course of Coxsackievirus infections. In: Bendinelli, M. and Friedman, H. (eds.) Coxsackieviruses. A General Update. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1988, pp. 135–157.
16. Epidemiological Research Laboratory PHLS – Viruses associated with neurological manifestations. Communicable Disease Report 1976. No. 48, page 1.
17. Prasher, D., Smith, A. & Findley, L. Sensory and cognitive event-related potentials in myalgic encephalomyelitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990, 53: 247–253.
18. Archard, L.C., Bowles, N.E., Behan, P.O., Bell, E.J. & Doyle, D. Post-viral fatigue syndrome: persistence of enterovirus RNA in muscle and elevated creatine kinase. J R Soc Med 1988, 6: 326–329.
19. Arnold, D.L., Radda, G.K., Bore, P.J. & Styles, P. Excessive intracellular acidosis of skeletal muscle on exercise in a patient with a post-viral exhaustion/fatigue syndrome. Lancet 1984, i: 1367–1369.
20. Jamal, G.A. & Hansen, S. Electromyographic studies in the post-viral fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985, 48: 691–694.
21. Matteucci, D., Paglianti, R., Giangregorio, A.M., Capobianchi, M.R., Pizanzini, F. & Bendinelli, M. Group B Coxsackie viruses readily establish persistent infections in human lymphoid cell lines. J Virol 1985, 56: 651–654.
22. Miller, J. Prolonged intra cerebral infection with polio virus in asymptomatic mice. Ann Neurol 1981, 9: 590–596.
23. Banatvala, J.E. Coxsackie B viral infections in cardiac disease. In: Waterson, A.P. (ed.) Clinical Virology. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, London 1983.
24. Reves, M.P. & Lerner, A.M. Myocarditis. Clinical and experimental correlates. In: Bendinelli, M. and Friedman, H. (eds.) Coxsackieviruses. A General Update. Plenum Press, New York, London, 1988, pp. 253–270.
25. Vallings, R. Myalgic encephalomyelitis – a consideration of treatment. The New Zealand Family Physician 1989, 16: 9–13.
26. McKinlay, M.A., Frank, J.A. Jr., Benziger, D.P. & Steinberg, B.A. Use of WIN 51711, a synthetic benzimidazole derivative, to inhibit paralysis in suckling mice. J Infect Dis 1986, 154: 678–681.
27. Dowsett, E.G. Human enteroviral infections. J Hosp Infect 1988, 11: 103–115.
John Chia's published papers on M.E. & CFS and Enteroviruses
28. Chia, John K.S.; Chia, Andrew (2003), "Diverse Etiologies for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome", Clinical Infectious Diseases, 36 (5): 671-672,
29. Chia, John K; Chia Andrew (2004) "Ribavirin and Interferon-α for the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Associated with Persistent Coxsackievirus B Infection: A Preliminary Observation"
30. Chia, JKS (2005)."The role of enterovirus in chronic fatigue syndrome" J Clin Pathol. 58 (11): 1126–32.
31. Chia JKS, Chia AY. J Clin Pathol 61(1):43–48. (2005) CFS is associated with chronic enterovirus infection of the stomach (case-control, biopsies)
32. Chia J, Chia A, Voeller M, Lee T, Chang R. (2010) Acute enterovirus infection followed by CFS or M.E. and viral persistence (case series with longitudinal biopsies) J Clin Pathol 63(2):165–168
33. Chia J, Chia A, Voeller M, Lee T, Chang R. (2010) Acute Gastritis Associated With Enterovirus Infection Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(1):16-25.
34. Chia J, Chia A, Voeller M, Lee T, Chang R (July 2011) Carcinoid Tumour Associated with Enterovirus Infection J Clin Pathol. 2011;64(8):722-726.
35. Chia, J. K.; Chia, A. Y.; Wang, D.; El-Habbal, R. (2015) Functional Dyspepsia and Chronic Gastritis Associated with Enteroviruses.
Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 5: 21–27.
36. Chia J, Chia A, Voeller M, Lee T, Rossi R. (2016) Chronic Enterovirus D68 Bronchiolitis Causing Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Open J Clin Med Case Rep. 2016;2(1):1046.
37. Chia J, Chia A, Wang D, El-Habbal R, Jyotheeswaran S, McCloud E. (2019) Echovirus 18 infection is associated with Crohn’s disease. Open J Gastroenterol; 9(8):174-183.
38. Chia J. (2009) Varicella-zoster virus reactivation during acute enterovirus infection. BMJ Case Reports.
39. Chia AY, Chia JK. (2009) Intestinal intussusception in adults due to acute enterovirus infection J Clin Pathol. 2009 Nov;62(11):1026–1028.
Comments
Post a Comment